I Represent Herein, this company Complaint Report on the behalf of our company. TO: Represent our case this Day of June 27, 2018 as a dispute against the operating companies TITLE AS: TrafficHaus.com (TrafficHaus) LOCATED: at this primary ADDRESS AS: 3590 5th Avenue. San Diego, CA 92103. Privately owned and operating under license to the parent company TITLE AS: MediaReps.com (Media Reps) LOCATED: at this primary ADDRESS AS: 3590 5th Avenue. San Diego, CA 92103. The Adult Advertising Network (TrafficHaus) headquarters parent company TITLE AS: MediaReps.com (MediaReps) also operates subsidiary companies TITLE AS: ReviveAds.com (ReviveAds), Digiregs.com (Digiregs). The umbrella of subsidiaries companies are under management by Defrauding Scammer: Mark Bauman as the lead management and business owner of the companies.
SUMMARY:
Herein, this company complaint report on the behalf of our company. We are disputing for owed revenue that was not paid to our company for the accumulated months of (March, 2017 through May, 2017) in the Total Amount of $303.16 as agree to as a publisher.
REASON FOR DISPUTE:
We are herein, disputing for our company rightfully revenue share to receive Full payment for traffic delivered to the (TrafficHaus.com) network from our website property. We have not been paid for revenue for the months of (March, 2017 in the amount of $10.76) and (May, 2017 in the amount of $292.40) for our website delivered traffic to the (TrafficHaus.com) network. We have provided a traffic data summary below of the traffic our company delivered to the (TrafficHaus.com) network.
Date Range: March 1, 2017 – May 31, 2017
Ad Zone Type: Desktop – Mobile
Total Ad Zones Impressions: 3, 745,902
Total Ad Zones Clicks: 119
Note: Attached is our valid proof as screen shots of our website traffic data according to our company (TrafficHaus) publisher account.
EXPLANATION OF DISPUTE:
We have not been given a legitimate reason why we have not been paid as a publisher. The only feedback that we received from our (TrafficHaus) account manager Mat Chow was that our website delivered unusual impressions. We herein, this dispute have proof that we boldly and “DIRECTLY” asked our (TrafficHaus) account manager Mat Chow about the “Specific Number” of (Ad Zones) we were allowed within (TrafficHaus) network Terms and Conditions policy. Entirely, before we setup (TrafficHaus) Desktop – Mobile (Ad Zones) live on our website. To insure that we were 100% in No Violation with (TrafficHaus.com) network Terms and Conditions.
Note: Read our proof of the original email confirming our “Direct Question” regarding to (TrafficHaus) (Ad Zones) policy.
(Our Direct Email Question)
Regarding to your Terms of use policy: How many ads zones are allowed per page? Including by each ad formats as Desktop, and Mobile formats on a single site page. Please note that a site may need to add Desktop, and Mobile units to monetize all traffic on a single web page. This will help determine what ad zones I may need to include or not to optimize the site for better overall CPM performance.
Note: Attached is the original email as a snippet confirming our proof.
(TrafficHaus Account Manager Mat Chow Email Direct Response)
Hi,
There is no limit to how many ads you can place on your site. However that being said, the more ads you have the more distracting it is for your sufers and the less clicks the ads receive. Less clicks lowers the conversions and as such = a lower CPM.
Note: Attached is the original email as a snippet confirming our proof.
*According to our references as solid proof of substantial visual of evidence from documentations to support our company dispute herein this report. The above (Email Direct Question) completely shows our company “INTEGRITY” that we were acting in “Good Faith” to Not Violate ANY Terms and Conditions. Including we are “Not Responsible” nor have “No Liability” that shall exempt us in this dispute to be a subject of any violations, or abide to any network violations that will prevent us from our rights as a publisher to receive payments. Considering herein this company dispute that we were 100% understanding of and told “DIRECTLY” by our (TrafficHaus) account manager Mat Chow that there was “NO LIMIT” was his exact words as written and recorded electronically. We made a pure honest attempt to completely understand (TrafficHaus.com) Terms and Conditions as provided herein this report as documents.
*This shall stand as hard evidence in bring justice for our company rights to ALL payments due beyond filing of this report, if this dispute is not settled and proceed in the courts.
Continued:
Our (TrafficHaus) publisher account manager Mat Chow falsely accused our website statistics of unusual ad impressions for our website Mobile (Ad Zones). Including, disrespectfully, made false accusations about our website traffic quality.
EXPLANATION:
Due to the reason of our website unusual impressions that (Mat Chow) pointed out was “solely” because he informed us “Directly” that there was “NO LIMIT” on how many ads we can place on our website. This is the 100% reason why our traffic impressions for our website Mobile (Ad Zones) appeared to be unusual. In general, technically the more (Ad Zones) a website is allowed to place on a website. The more impressions the website will accumulate for each (Ad Zone) placements. This is very simple mathematics and basic traffic analytics knowledge to understand.
Our (TrafficHaus) publisher account manager Mat Chow just could not understand this reason. Unfortunately, this was our company downfall by trusting our (TrafficHaus) account manager Mat Chow convincingly giving us the understanding of the (Ad Zones) limit that we were allowed to place on our website. He took “No Responsibility” for his own actions and place ALL the “BLAME” on our company. Additionally, Mat Chow Denied of informing our company of the (Ad Zones) limit. This is also 100% a Bold Face Lie! Additionally, lying about our company payment was going to be paid on June 9, 2017 makes (TrafficHaus) account manager Mat Chow a compulsive liar. *According to our proof of documentations that we have presented herein this report.
We then proceeded to forward to our (TrafficHaus) account manager Mat Chow proof in several documents of our website traffic. Including, our website (Google Analytics) confirming our traffic data and quality. However, after we presented our documents to our (TrafficHaus) account manager Mat Chow we were told that we will still receive our publisher payments. Additionally, we received our (TrafficHaus) publisher statement on June 5, 2017 informing us about our company earnings. Including stating that our company payment were going to be paid within (5 to 10) business days.
Note: Read our valid proof of both documents claiming that our company will receive our publisher payments.
(TrafficHaus Account Manager Mat Chow Email Response)
Your account will be paid on the 9th.
(TrafficHaus May 2017 Publisher Statement Email)
This email is to notify you of your earnings with TrafficHaus from 2017-05-01 to 2017-05-31.
We apologize for the delay in sending this valuable information to you.
Your earnings for this period are $292.42. Payment can be expected within five to ten business days.
Detailed statistics can be found by logging into your account at TrafficHaus. Any further questions regarding your account can sent to me by email or Skype.
Thank you for the continued opportunity to serve you!
Regards,
Francisco Villafana
Jr. Data Analyst
TrafficHaus
*According to the above written document as a reference by our (TrafficHaus) account manager Mat Chow email and including our publisher statement from (TrafficHaus) Jr. Data Analyst, Francisco Villafana that our company will receive payment.
Note: Attached are the original documents of (TrafficHaus) sent emails. *Including additional screen shots from our (TrafficHaus) publisher account confirming our (TrafficHaus) website traffic data, revenue by (Ad Zones ), pending payments as our proof of documents.
*UPDATE*
We no longer have access to our (TrafficHaus) publisher account any more. Due to the fact that our (username or password) was deliberately changed or deleted to keep our company from accessing our account. The (TrafficHaus) staff employees that I know of that have permission to access our account are (TrafficHaus) publisher account managers (Mat Chow), (Nick Rosenblum) or other staff employees that may have that permission. This is a criminal act of business fraud that (TrafficHaus.com) network engage into to keep our company revenue. *Including to keep our company from compiling evidence against (TrafficHaus.com) network.
COMPANY RESOLUTION REQUEST:
We are requesting this Day of filing this company complaint report on June 27, 2018. In accordance to resolve our company dispute against the operating companies TITLE AS: MediaReps.com (Media Reps) the parent company of TrafficHaus.com (TrafficHaus) herein this report. MUST pay ALL payments due to our company as agreed to as a publisher revenue share.
*Failure to meet our company demands may result in more actions and disputes. *Including punitive damages for our company.
COMPANY DISPUTE CLOSURE:
Please acknowledge that our company put forth our best efforts to resolve this dispute matter. We sent out (2) statements of Complaint Notices to several (TrafficHaus.com) staff employees by email. Including to the headquarters parent company TITLE AS: MediaReps.com (Media Reps) regarding to our company complaint about (TrafficHaus.com) herein this report. We received “No Replies” by either companies including (TrafficHaus) publisher account managers: (Mat Chow, Nick Rosenblum) regarding to our company matters. So then I realize that our company have just been Defrauded! The whole entire company of (TrafficHaus.com), (MediaReps.com) are FRAUD and scammers! The Defrauding companies did NOT cooperate nor care to find a resolution to our company business matters.
PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIAL DISCLOSURE DISCLAIMER:
The information that was disclosed or included herein this report. Shall Not abide to any policy Terms and Conditions nor permitted use of, for any kind of privacy leakage thereof, or abide to any agreements nor other confidential information restrictions herein this report. The information that was used in this report by our company was solely used to provide evidence to support our case in this dispute. Additionally, to inform the General Public about SCAMS, Untrustworthy, and Fraudulent companies as such in this report.
Notice: This complaint report can also be reviewed or obtained as a copy on RipOffReport.com